<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Step #5-INVESTIGATION</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inventionaddict.com/2009/06/11/step-5-investigation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inventionaddict.com/2009/06/11/step-5-investigation/</link>
	<description>The how to invent a new product headquarters for new inventions by an inventor for inventors.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 23:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Step#7-PRODUCTIZATION &#124; InventionAddict</title>
		<link>http://www.inventionaddict.com/2009/06/11/step-5-investigation/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>Step#7-PRODUCTIZATION &#124; InventionAddict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventionaddict.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/step-5-investigation#comment-318</guid>
		<description>[...] are the 12 steps to invent a product: 1. Realization 2. Frustration 3. Ideation 4. Exploration 5. Investigation 6. Simulation 7. Productization 8. Confirmation 9. Communication 10. Conversation 11. Negotiation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are the 12 steps to invent a product: 1. Realization 2. Frustration 3. Ideation 4. Exploration 5. Investigation 6. Simulation 7. Productization 8. Confirmation 9. Communication 10. Conversation 11. Negotiation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Step #8-CONFIRMATION &#124; InventionAddict</title>
		<link>http://www.inventionaddict.com/2009/06/11/step-5-investigation/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Step #8-CONFIRMATION &#124; InventionAddict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 19:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventionaddict.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/step-5-investigation#comment-314</guid>
		<description>[...] are the 12 steps to invent a product: 1. Realization 2. Frustration 3. Ideation 4. Exploration 5. Investigation 6. Simulation 7. Productization 8. Confirmation 9. Communication 10. Conversation 11. Negotiation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are the 12 steps to invent a product: 1. Realization 2. Frustration 3. Ideation 4. Exploration 5. Investigation 6. Simulation 7. Productization 8. Confirmation 9. Communication 10. Conversation 11. Negotiation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Step #2-FRUSTRATION &#124; InventionAddict</title>
		<link>http://www.inventionaddict.com/2009/06/11/step-5-investigation/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Step #2-FRUSTRATION &#124; InventionAddict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 19:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventionaddict.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/step-5-investigation#comment-308</guid>
		<description>[...] are the 12 steps to invent a product: 1. Realization 2. Frustration 3. Ideation 4. Exploration 5. Investigation 6. Simulation 7. Productization 8. Confirmation 9. Communication 10. Conversation 11. Negotiation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are the 12 steps to invent a product: 1. Realization 2. Frustration 3. Ideation 4. Exploration 5. Investigation 6. Simulation 7. Productization 8. Confirmation 9. Communication 10. Conversation 11. Negotiation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: invention addict</title>
		<link>http://www.inventionaddict.com/2009/06/11/step-5-investigation/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>invention addict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventionaddict.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/step-5-investigation#comment-100</guid>
		<description>Good question. It really comes down to the claims of the patent. A lot of times, it&#039;s obvious that the idea is the same.Patent law says that a person skilled in the art should find the difference an obvious difference.If you feel strongly, you could get a professional opinion from an attorney. E-mail me and I can connect you with some people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question. It really comes down to the claims of the patent. A lot of times, it&#39;s obvious that the idea is the same.Patent law says that a person skilled in the art should find the difference an obvious difference.If you feel strongly, you could get a professional opinion from an attorney. E-mail me and I can connect you with some people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: invention addict</title>
		<link>http://www.inventionaddict.com/2009/06/11/step-5-investigation/#comment-479</link>
		<dc:creator>invention addict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventionaddict.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/step-5-investigation#comment-479</guid>
		<description>Good question. It really comes down to the claims of the patent. A lot of times, it&#039;s obvious that the idea is the same.Patent law says that a person skilled in the art should find the difference an obvious difference.If you feel strongly, you could get a professional opinion from an attorney. E-mail me and I can connect you with some people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question. It really comes down to the claims of the patent. A lot of times, it&#039;s obvious that the idea is the same.Patent law says that a person skilled in the art should find the difference an obvious difference.If you feel strongly, you could get a professional opinion from an attorney. E-mail me and I can connect you with some people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.inventionaddict.com/2009/06/11/step-5-investigation/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventionaddict.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/step-5-investigation#comment-99</guid>
		<description>What if you find one thats similar are you done?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if you find one thats similar are you done?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.inventionaddict.com/2009/06/11/step-5-investigation/#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventionaddict.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/step-5-investigation#comment-478</guid>
		<description>What if you find one thats similar are you done?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if you find one thats similar are you done?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tania Reynaert</title>
		<link>http://www.inventionaddict.com/2009/06/11/step-5-investigation/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Tania Reynaert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventionaddict.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/step-5-investigation#comment-98</guid>
		<description>I really really really don&#039;t like reading patents! :-)great post Stephen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really really really don&#39;t like reading patents! <img src='http://www.inventionaddict.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> great post Stephen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tania Reynaert</title>
		<link>http://www.inventionaddict.com/2009/06/11/step-5-investigation/#comment-477</link>
		<dc:creator>Tania Reynaert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventionaddict.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/step-5-investigation#comment-477</guid>
		<description>I really really really don&#039;t like reading patents! :-)great post Stephen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really really really don&#039;t like reading patents! <img src='http://www.inventionaddict.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> great post Stephen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sally229</title>
		<link>http://www.inventionaddict.com/2009/06/11/step-5-investigation/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>sally229</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventionaddict.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/step-5-investigation#comment-97</guid>
		<description>I think this step can be one of the most intimidating steps for most inventors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this step can be one of the most intimidating steps for most inventors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

